New China Health Reform Plan “Impenetrable”

Reports on Chinese citizen reactions to the new health reform plan released for public debate are now out:

CCTV newsman Bai Yansong said in an TV interview that apart from the complaints people had about the medical system in the past, they now have to face another issue: Trying to understand the newly released reform draft. “I am personally convinced that many people won’t be able to offer any opinions for the simple fact that they are not able to make sense of it”, Bai said. “The funny thing is that it’s impenetrable after putting all the Chinese characters together,” and the first reaction to solicitation would be “not understandable.” He also pointed out four flaws of the draft:

-too much medical terminology causing trouble for ordinary people
-twisted wording along with sentences with confusing punctuation
-dry and meaningless language
-too general and hollow due to its form of expression

The Chinese government’s response is that it’s expected that “ordinary people aren’t able to make sense of it,” and they are planning to “publish a friendlier version of questions and answers concerning central issues of the new reform after collecting the most frequently asked questions.”

Much of the health care policy debate in this country as well sits on a similar sea of non-comprehension by “ordinary people.” I remember the proposed Clinton Health Security Act in the early 1990s. It was also an impenetrable tome of jargon and fragmented presentation. Maybe it comes with the territory. If it does, then the hacks and not the wonks will rule.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Armstrong to do the Giro d’Italia

This is so sweet. The Giro is a great race. No matter whether he wins or not; no matter whether he does the Tour de France as well, the man will generate massive interest in cycling again and for cancer awareness.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

ICD-10s: Sometimes “Pay-Me-Later” is a Better Strategy

From Healthcare IT News on ICD-10 Codes:

The American Health Information Management Association leadership wants to be clear: Even though it will cost millions of dollars and the process is likely to be disruptive, U.S. healthcare must embrace a new, expanded code for diagnostics and billing.

Proponents like AHIMA and the American Hospital Association say the new code will bring the healthcare system into the 21st Century. It will also replace an ICD-9 code set that is broken.

“It could have serious, serious ramifications for our healthcare data,” said Sue Bowman, AHIMA‘s director of coding, during this week’s AHIMA convention in Seattle.

“It’s pay me now or pay me later,” added Jill Dennis, AHIMA‘s senior vice president.

With all the financial stress burdening health care, and the economy in general, why push for the 2011 implementation deadline? The cost to payers and providers will be in the billions of dollars not millions. And we aren’t even able to take full clinical and electronic advantage of the ICD-9 codes at this point! Also HIPAA’s 5010 changes will in addition cost the health care system millions as well. Let’s give the stakeholders at least some space and time to adapt and do it right.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

China Opens Medical Reform Plan to Public Debate

Xinhua reports today that China’s long-awaited health care reform plan was released for public debate and promises to cover all urban and rural residents by 2020. Medical reform has been deliberated by authorities since 2006.

The reformed plan clarifies government’s responsibility by saying that it plays a dominant role in providing public health and basic medical service. “Both central and local governments should increase health funding. The percentage of government’s input in total health expenditure should be increased gradually so that the financial burden of individuals can be reduced,” the draft said. The plan listed public health, rural areas, city community health services and basic medical insurance as four key areas for government investment.The plan also promised to tighten government control over medical fees in public hospitals and to set up a “basic medicine system” to quell public complaints of rising drug costs. The basic medicine system includes a catalogue of necessary drugs that would be produced and distributed under government control and supervision. Its goal is to ensure accessibility to a range of basic medicines and to prevent manufacturers and businesspeople from circumventing existing price controls.

We’ve been following China’s developments on health care reform for a while now (here, here, here, and especially here). The process has been slow but deliberate with significant research and policy debate on the role of private insurance, for example. China is taking the long view. The question is whether it will be too long for the millions now without health care, and too centered on government bureaucracies to deliver that care.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

The Challenge of the e-Patient

Conclusions from e_Patients: How they can help us heal healthcare written by Tom Ferguson, MD and the e-Patient Scholars Working Group ( Supported by a Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Quality Health Care Grant):

e-Patients are driving a healthcare revolution of major proportions.
The old Industrial Age paradigm, in which health professionals were viewed as the exclusive source of medical knowledge and wisdom, is gradually giving way to a new Information Age worldview in which patients, family caregivers, and the systems and networks they create are increasingly seen as important healthcare resources. But the emerging world of the e-patient cannot be fully understood and appreciated in the context of pre-Internet medical constructs. The medical worldview of the 20th century did not recognize the legitimacy of lay medical competence and autonomy. Thus its metrics, research methods, and cultural vocabulary are poorly suited to studying this emerging field. Something akin to a system upgrade in our thinking is needed—a new cultural operating system for healthcare in which e-patients can be recognized as a valuable new type of renewable resource, managing much of their own care, providing care for others, helping professionals improve the quality of their services, and participating in entirely new kinds of clinician-patient collaborations, patient-initiated research, and self-managed care. Developing, refining, and implementing this new open-source cultural operating system will be one of the principal challenges facing healthcare in the early decades of the 21st century. But difficult as this task may prove to be, it will pay remarkable dividends. For given the recognition and support they deserve, these new medical colleagues can help us find sustainable solutions to many of the seemingly intractable problems that now plague all modern healthcare systems.

( Thanks to ICMCC)

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

In the Woods and Off the Grid

I’ve been hiking in Yosemite National Park as well as Sequoia National Park for the last week. Being here forces you to go cold turkey when it comes to online communications. So it’s a good detox site for us net junkies. Just avoid the rock slides and all. But right now I’m in San Francisco – internet Mecca – and am looking forward to participating in the Institute for the Future’s Health Horizons Fall Conference on Reinventing Health Care in a Mobile World starting Tuesday October 14 at the Fairmont Hotel. No rock slides there I hope.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Sarah Palin’s Debate Notes

Enough said.

Thanks to www.adennak.com and The Daily Dish

The New Medical Guard Speaks on Medicine 2.0

From Bertalan (Berci) Meskó, a last-year medical student, studying to become a clinical geneticist:

I cannot imagine my post-graduate daily activities without the tools of web 2.0. With RSS feed, I can keep myself up-to-date in my field of interest (personalized genetics) easily. By reading blog carnivals (such as Gene Genie), I’m sure I’ll know about all the important news and announcements of genetics. As I use medical community sites (e.g. Tiromed.com), it’s quite easy to find residency places or international collaborators for my research projects. And many more examples prove, at least for me, the real power of web 2.0. More. . .

(Thanks to ICMCC, DiagnosisPR and ScienceRoll)

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

IFTF “Reinventing Health Care in a Mobile World” Conference

The Institute for the Future‘s Health Horizons Fall Conference on Reinventing Health Care in a Mobile World will be held on October 14-15, 2008 at the Fairmont Hotel in San Francisco. I’ve been asked to participate on a panel moderated by IFTF Research Director, Cesar Castro, looking at health care innovation in a mobile world. As readers of this blog know, I’m very interested in the multiple uses of cell phones in health care – see here, here, here, and here – and believe that for the underserved, rural, poor and disabled the development of this technology and the promotion of its use in health care is critical.

While I’m there I’ll also do some blogging on the emerging issues as the mood strikes.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Physician Brain Drain a Critical Issue for Developing Countries

nurse anne bell of nashville

Image by venusnaturalis via Flickr

Reuters reports today (Kavita Chandran and Tan Ee Lyn) that the

. . .health crisis in developing countries is . . . being exacerbated by the West as countries relax stringent immigration regulations to attract doctors and nurses from less developed countries to boost their own flagging health systems while saving money on expensive training.

The consequences of this “brain drain” are grave as it leaves gaping holes in the healthcare systems of developing countries where diseases such as AIDS, tuberculosis and malaria run rampant and children die daily from diarrhea.

I’ve written a number of times that we seriously underestimated the depth and impact of the globalization of health care and how entangled and interdependent we are with the health problems plaguing the rest of the planet. So at the risk of being a PITA I want to repeat my message.

  1. Our public discourse in health care is often too insular, too self-serving and thus irrelevant when it comes to the rest of the world;
  2. The world, and health care with it, is changing in dramatic ways;
  3. We are not paying enough attention to the above two points.

Step back for a moment and consider the overwhelming preponderance of words, time and money we spend in taking apart the U.S. health care system. Now think about how much of that talk goes toward building an understanding of our dependencies on the rest of the world for that care. Or for that matter, how much of the world’s health care, in turn, depends on us.

Not much. In fact we tend to polarize our thoughts into strict them-and-us compartments that essentially diminish any appreciation of the depth of those inter-relationships.

It also shows in our ignorance of health care systems in other countries (especially so when we boast of the superiority of either theirs or ours); in our odd blindness to the fact that, demographically speaking, the world is already living in our own house; and in our easy dismissal of international health comparisons not favorable to us. We are, to be blunt, isolationist, and to many on the planet, arrogant,when it comes to health care.

Keeping the world at an arm’s length is no longer possible or desirable. Much like an “American” car or anything you can buy at Wal-Mart, health care is fast becoming the product of a complex world-wide process. While the health care services Americans receive may appear to be local, each drug, patient record, and operating room is the culmination of a complicated international exchange we need to better understand.

Every health care issue confronting today has underlying global aspects. The U.S. health care is discovering itself inextricably caught up in international diplomacy, the throes of globalization, and even the murky dealings of illegal transnational organizations.

We’re witnessing the emergence of a new order, with its corresponding growth opportunities, intractable problems, and chaotic flash points. For example, the drug industry: new drug biologics, research, testing, manufacturing, pricing, distribution, profits, and counterfeiting — all are derivatives of active public and private global networks. International coordination and information exchange is clearly critical in controlling infectious diseases such as SARS, avian flu, or HIV.

“Medical tourism” (international hospital competition) increases every year. More of our physicians are either foreign-born or being trained in other countries– indeed our entire health care infrastructure is increasingly dependent on foreign labor. Research into other countries’ health care practices will usher a new wave of alternative and complementary care into mainstream medicine. And, of course, health care IT. Electronic claims transaction, systems installations and software testing, call centers with advanced technology –- you name it — and its major components are more and more often located offshore.

Borders are increasingly, or already, irrelevant to health care. We are either getting flattened, or doing it to others. Adapting to that emerging reality is critical. But we seem to be missing the signals. Even in the grand ideas fermenting in the speeches of our presidential candidates we see little recognition of what is going on around us. So we need to start interrogating the global connection of every health care problem we face.

The message has to get out: the globalization of health care is not an optional sub-specialty anymore. It is front and center required reading.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]