Another Use for Mobile Phones in Health Care: Stopping Bullets

From WDSU.com

A stray bullet hit a man in his chest while he was mowing his lawn Saturday, but he escaped injury because the bullet slammed into a cell phone in his pocket. . .

(The man) said he didn’t know what hit him, but he knew something was wrong. When he tried to dial 911, his cell phone fell apart in his hands. . . The stray bullet had hit his Motorola cell phone. . . he normally keeps the phone in his pants pocket, but that day he had it in a pocket over his heart.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Britain’s Mobile Phone “Nurses”

In my continuing posts on mobile phones in health care comes news from the Telegraph:

People suffering from asthma, diabetes and high blood pressure simply enter details of their condition and treatment into standard mobile handsets that have been programmed with special software.

The data is automatically sent to hospital database where it is analysed by a nurse who decides whether any action needs to be taken.

Studies have shown that the system helps catch complications before they get out of control, without burdening patients with regular visits to their GP.

It also reduces hospital admissions for long-term patients by up to 90 per cent, potentially saving the NHS millions of pounds per year. (More)

Thanks to ICMCC.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

President-Elect Obama: A New Day is Upon Us

What an amazing evening with the triumph of Hawaii’s own Barack Obama. As readers who have followed this blog know, we have been a strong Obama supporter from the beginning of his candidacy. The emotional exhale with his victory last night was felt not only by me, not only here on this little speck of rock in the middle of the Pacific, but all over this blue planet.  But the time will come oh so soon when when we must all inhale again and fortify ourselves again to deal with the seemingly intractable problems in health care. So, for now, I’m upbeat and optimistic. The country is ready to shape a new future for her citizens. We will all be in the bus and along for the ride. Let’s hope it’s headed in the right direction.

PatientsLikeMe: A New Disease Management Tool?

Ben Heywood, co-founder and President of PatientsLikeMe, recently participated in live chat session (see transcript) hosted by the World Health Care Congress. I was particularly interested in his several comments related to the value of his site to disease management programs now sponsored by health plans and other health care organizations.

I think one of the areas we have expanded into earlier then we thought was in the payer/health plan space. Payers are looking at PatientsLikeMe as a lighter-weight disease management platform. A peer-based DM, sort of like an online version of AA (the most successful peer-based DM program around) . . .

The discussions we are having is around offering PatientsLikeMe as a service to their (health plan) members – we have seen some strong anecdotal evidence that patients are using healthcare more efficiently by learning from other patients experiences and data.

We think that using our site makes patients more compliant – we are working on several pilots to prove this out. . .

Our business model is really about engaging industry into these communities – so one consideration as we look at new diseases is for whom this will help make better products. First and foremost, we need to make communities that help patients – so that is always our first consideration. . .

We get a lot of amazing feedback from out users from… depression patients who say using the site keeps them out of the hospital to a patient in MS that said that the site saved her life as her doc over-prescribed one of her medication. . .

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

New Study: Costs of Moving to ICD-10 Diagnostic Codes for Providers

Conclusions from a new study on the transition to ICD-10 diagnostic codes:

If ICD‐10‐CM were to be mandated as the code set to replace ICD‐9‐CM, it would have a significant effect on both the business and clinical processes of physician practices and clinical laboratories.  The impact is expected to be greater than the impact of the NPI changes or the initial HIPAA changes,because virtually every aspect of the business – documentation, quality measures, coverage andpayment policies, etc., would be affected by the of changing the coding of diagnoses to a greater specificity.

This change will have some one‐time costs, such as training for most staff, changes to superbills to include ten times as many codes, upgrading IT systems for the new code set and changing templates, and reviewing insurance plan contracts for changes to payment  and coverage.  The size of a practice and vendor costs play a major part in the   overall cost of this transition.  Total costs can be expected to range anywhere from around $83000 for a small three person practice to the millions for the very largest practices. In addition to the one‐time costs involved, there will also be permanent additional costs. The greater specificity of the ICD‐10‐CM code set will require more specific documentation in provider records.  This will take physicians additional time, adding about 3‐4% to their  workload.  Again, this is a permanent increase.

For clinical laboratories, besides the changes in IT systems and training, they will be faced with additional difficulties of getting the correct code from ordering physicians.  While a relatively small problem today, any increase in incorrect or missing coding will have a significant impact on both their workload and cash flow.

Physician practices and laboratories face additional issues which will delay their implementation. Much of their documentation and insurance decisions are driven by the coverage and reimbursement policies of health plans. These policies will change to be based on the more specific ICD‐10‐CM codes.  Practices will have to wait to see these changed policies before making their business process changes. Therefore, much of their work will have to wait for health plan decisions.

Should the change be made, it can be expected that there will be a significant learning curve for providers in the documentation and coding of diagnoses in ICD‐10‐CM. This will cause payment delays and claim rejections, probably for at least a year. The cash flow of practices will thus be negatively affected.

See my previous post on ICD-10 codes here. Thanks to Government Healthcare IT.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

New China Health Reform Plan “Impenetrable”

Reports on Chinese citizen reactions to the new health reform plan released for public debate are now out:

CCTV newsman Bai Yansong said in an TV interview that apart from the complaints people had about the medical system in the past, they now have to face another issue: Trying to understand the newly released reform draft. “I am personally convinced that many people won’t be able to offer any opinions for the simple fact that they are not able to make sense of it”, Bai said. “The funny thing is that it’s impenetrable after putting all the Chinese characters together,” and the first reaction to solicitation would be “not understandable.” He also pointed out four flaws of the draft:

-too much medical terminology causing trouble for ordinary people
-twisted wording along with sentences with confusing punctuation
-dry and meaningless language
-too general and hollow due to its form of expression

The Chinese government’s response is that it’s expected that “ordinary people aren’t able to make sense of it,” and they are planning to “publish a friendlier version of questions and answers concerning central issues of the new reform after collecting the most frequently asked questions.”

Much of the health care policy debate in this country as well sits on a similar sea of non-comprehension by “ordinary people.” I remember the proposed Clinton Health Security Act in the early 1990s. It was also an impenetrable tome of jargon and fragmented presentation. Maybe it comes with the territory. If it does, then the hacks and not the wonks will rule.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

ICD-10s: Sometimes “Pay-Me-Later” is a Better Strategy

From Healthcare IT News on ICD-10 Codes:

The American Health Information Management Association leadership wants to be clear: Even though it will cost millions of dollars and the process is likely to be disruptive, U.S. healthcare must embrace a new, expanded code for diagnostics and billing.

Proponents like AHIMA and the American Hospital Association say the new code will bring the healthcare system into the 21st Century. It will also replace an ICD-9 code set that is broken.

“It could have serious, serious ramifications for our healthcare data,” said Sue Bowman, AHIMA‘s director of coding, during this week’s AHIMA convention in Seattle.

“It’s pay me now or pay me later,” added Jill Dennis, AHIMA‘s senior vice president.

With all the financial stress burdening health care, and the economy in general, why push for the 2011 implementation deadline? The cost to payers and providers will be in the billions of dollars not millions. And we aren’t even able to take full clinical and electronic advantage of the ICD-9 codes at this point! Also HIPAA’s 5010 changes will in addition cost the health care system millions as well. Let’s give the stakeholders at least some space and time to adapt and do it right.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.